For a printer-friendly version, click here.

To access our Biotech/Biopharm catalog of services, click here.

 

Guidelines to

Mycoplasma Testing for Biologics

 

Overview

Guidelines for mycoplasma testing of biotherapeutics is addressed in several international pharmacopoeias (e.g., European Pharmacopoeia [EP] and Japanese Pharmacopoeia [JP]), Section 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) and Food and Drug Administration Points to Consider (PTC) documents.  This document provides a brief summary of the test methods available, sample requirements for testing the most common types of biological products and outlines existing regulations and current industry practice.  Exceptions may exist depending on the product and the process from which the product was generated.  

 

Mycoplasma Testing Methods 

 

The various international pharmacopoeia, Code of Federal Regulations and other guidance documents provide protocols for testing biological samples.  Below are the various methodologies employed for detecting mycoplasma from biological test samples: 

 

Direct Assay (Microbiological Culture)

The direct method requires the test article be directly introduced to plate agar and liquid growth media (broth) capable of growing a variety of mycoplasma including aerobic, microaerophilic and anaerobic strains. (See table on reverse.)  Broth cultures are incubated and subpassaged to plate agar.  After the required incubation period, the agar plates are observed microscopically for the presence of mycoplasma colonies.   

 Indirect Assay (Indicator Mammalian Cell Culture)

The indirect method requires the test article be inoculated directly onto tissue culture cover slips or flasks containing a monolayer of indicator cells (VERO cells are the most commonly used).  The cells on cover slips are fixed and stained using a DNA binding stain (such as Hoechst stain) and identification of contaminating mycoplasma is by visual observation via fluorescent microscopy. 

 

Mycoplasma PCR

Specific oligonucleotide primers capable of amplifying and detecting multiple strains of mycoplasma DNA while excluding other contaminating DNA are used in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT). The JP provides a specific protocol and the EP provides guidelines describing acceptable protocols for PCR method validation and comparability studies. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The pharmacopoeias, PTC, and CFR protocols vary with their recommen-dations on how to conduct the indirect and direct assays.  The majority of biological samples will be tested using either the PTC or EP in vitro-based protocols.  However, the EP allows for PCR testing if a method validation program is conducted and comparability is demonstrated.   Consulting with the appropriate regulatory authorities is recommended before using PCR for detection of mycoplasma for regulatory submissions.

 

AppTec provides mycoplasma testing protocols that comply with PTC, EP and 21 CFR 610.30 guidelines as well as several PCR methods.  Customized testing protocols and programs can be provided for those clients with additional requirements, e.g., gene or cell therapy products, raw materials or 9 CFR and Barile (high volume) methodologies. 

 

Mycoplasma Test Qualification (Mycoplasmastasis)  

 

It is important to determine if the test article that will be tested for mycoplasma contains elements (product-specific growth inhibitors) that will interfere with the growth of any mycoplasma contaminant (contained within the sample) in the growth media used for the assay. This qualification testing is commonly referred to as a mycoplasmastasis test.  Although the 21 CFR and the FDA PTC guidelines do not reference a mycoplasmastasis test requirement, the EP and JP do recommend conducting a mycoplasma-stasis test. The qualification test is typically required only once for a given sample type, provided that no changes to the source, product, formulation or manufacturing process occur. 

Testing Requirements by Test Article Type 

 

For the following product types, the test method of choice can depend on the geographic location of the regulatory submission or product type.  In addition, where appropriate, providing the sample in conditioned media and free of selective reagents (e.g., methotrexate, antibiotics) is desired.  If PCR assays are used, 4-5 mL of sample is recommended for testing. 

 

Cell Line Testing (Cell Banks/Stocks, Cell Therapy Products)

Cell stocks require mycoplasma testing as a quality control measure prior to the start of GMP cell banking or product manufacturing activities.  Likewise, once GMP manufactured cell banks are generated, mycoplasma testing is required as part of cell line characterization programs.  For autologous cell therapy programs, it is acceptable to perform PCR mycoplasma assays to take advantage of reduced turnaround times.  An in vitro method is typically conducted in parallel with the PCR methods to provide additional assurance that the test article is mycoplasma free.  For all cell line testing, a single vial or sample of the cell bank (1.0 x 106 to 1.0 x 107cells) can be expanded to provide the necessary volume required for testing.  

 

Viral Banks/Stocks, Viral Gene Therapy, Viral Vaccine Products

Virus banks or stocks require mycoplasma testing as part of a quality control measure prior to GMP activities, as a requirement for viral bank characterization programs, and as part of a viral product lot release program.  Typically mycoplasma lot release testing is conducted on the bulk viral harvest.  Virus products that are toxic, replication competent or capable of infecting the indicator cell line may require modifications to the standard mycoplasma test protocols by using a non-permissive cell line (e.g., NIH/3T3), diluting the test article, or using a neutralization antibody.  In most cases involving protocol changes, additional assay qualification (mycoplasmastasis) may be required. Often it is not practical for viral product manufacturers to supply the entire volume of test article required for mycoplasma assays due to factors such as sample availability or lot size.  In these instances, a patient dose may be relevant.  If possible, 6.0 x 1010 virus particles may also be acceptable.  In such cases, test article would be diluted to appropriate total volume required for the protocol. For PCR methods, a single patient dose may be relevant.   

 

End of Production Cells Testing (For Protein Products)

Within the biotherapeutics industry, “end of production cells” has many other names, including cell harvest, unprocessed bulk, clarified cell harvest or cells at the limit of in vitro cell age.  In all cases, mycoplasma testing is required and typically the full volume of the test article can be provided.  

 

Bulk Drug Substance (BDS) and Final Drug Product (DP) Testing (For Protein Products)

Mycoplasma testing is not recommended nor required on BDS or DP of protein therapeutics that undergo standard purification processes. 

 

Conclusion

 

Mycoplasma contamination of cell lines and biotherapeutic products represents a significant biosafety concern.  The ubiquitous nature of mycoplasma in man, animals and the environment increases the likelihood of the introduction of these organisms into cell lines or a manufacturing process.  AppTec offers a variety of mycoplasma detection protocols to address your research and regulated testing needs, ensuring product quality and safety during different stages of pharmaceutical development.  Assays can be performed under research, GLP or GMP conditions.   

 

NOTE:  It is imperative that Sponsor review all mycoplasma testing protocols, sample volumes and testing regimens with the appropriate regulatory agency prior to initiation of testing.

 

 For information regarding available mycoplasma assays or to discuss the mycoplasma test method most appropriate for your sample type, please contact an AppTec Account Manager at 888.794.0077.   

  MYCOPLASMA TESTING METHODS COMPARISON 
 Points to Consider (PTC) - 1993European Pharmacopoeia 2.6.7 -2007 21 CFR 610.30Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP) – XIV Part II Section 9 (2006)
Direct Assay – Plate Agar Portion
Incubation2 plates – 1 agar type(anaerobic conditions)2 or more plates – 1 agar type(microaerophilic conditions)20 plates – 2 agar types (10 aerobic & 10 anaerobic plates) 4 plates – 1 agar types(2 aerobic and 2 anaerobic plates)
Required Test Article Volume0.4 mL0.4 – 0.8 mL4.0 mL0.8 mL (0.2 mL each plate)
Plate Observations(Post Inoculation)14 days or more14 days or more14 days or moreDay 7 and 14
Direct Assay – Broth AND AGAR Portion
Day 0 Broth inoculation1 x 50 mL liquid broth (T-75 flask)1 x 100 mL liquid broth (T-75 flask)4 x 10mL semi-solid broth
(T-12.5 flask)
2 x 100 mL liquid broth (T-75 flasks)
Total Test
Article Required
10 mL10 mL4 mL (1 mL/flask)20 mL (10 mL/flask)
Incubation1 flask – 14 days(aerobic conditions)1 tightly stoppered flask – 21 days4 flasks – 14 days(2 aerobic & 2 anaerobic flasks)2 flasks – 14 days(1 aerobic & 1 anaerobic flasks)
Sub-Cultures to Plate AgarDay 3, 7, 14(anaerobic plate conditions)Day 2, 3, or 4;  6, 7, or 8; 
13, 14, or 15;  19, 20, or 21(microaerophilic conditions)
Day 3 & 14(aerobic and anaerobic conditions)Days 3, 7, 14(aerobic and anaerobic conditions)
Plate Observations(Post Inoculation)14 days or more14 days or more(except day 19, 20, or 21 subculture which is 7 days)14 days or moreDay 7 and 14
Indirect Assay – Cell Culture (e.g., VERO)
Cell Culture InoculationTest article is inoculated
onto coverslips
Test article is inoculated into
T-25 culture flasks
No guideline providedTest article is inoculated
onto coverslips
Subpassage To CoverslipsNoneAfter at least 3 days of incubationNANA
Fix and Stain3-5 days post inoculation3 to 5 days after subpassageNA3-6 days post inoculation
Required Test
Article Volume
3.0 mL3.0 mLNA3.0 mL
     
Total Test Article Required for Assay15 mL15 mL9 mL26 mL
Assay Duration
(on-test time)
28 days28 days28 days28 days
Control Organisms RecommendedDirect - M. pneumoniae & M. oraleIndirect -  M. hyorhinis and M. orale(Other equivalent strains acceptable)Depends on product type[See EP 2.6.7 for more information.](Other equivalent strains acceptable)2 known strains(one of which must be M. pneumoniae )Direct - M. pneumoniae & M. oraleIndirect -  M. hyorhinis and M. orale(Other equivalent strains acceptable)
AppTec Control Organisms Used

For all methods:  M. hyorhinis (indirect assay only), M. orale (direct and indirect assay), M. pneumoniae (direct assay only).

Other strains are available if required.